SELF
CENTERED SOCIETY is hired to carry out a due dilligence process for ICU, Inc.
After several researches the following information is found out. The
operational cash flow for the next year is expected to be 500k, there is a 10
year debt demanding 200k yearly, the historical rate of change in percentage
for incomes is 5% per year, with the current assets and forthcoming market
conditions ICU is expected to last 20 years and the discount rate applied to
ICU operations is fixed at 10% the liabilities are discounted at the free-risk
rate of 7%. On the other hand, buildings, equipment and machinery might be sold
at the end of year 20 at 1000
Question:
PV of ICU with g, discounting debt and adding market rescue value? Answers
as follow:
PV=500*[1-(1.1/1.05)^-20/(0.1-0.05)]=6056.042028k
We
could have discounted the value out of the 500 but that would be wrong, why?
Because, while the operational cash flow grows yearly around 5% on average; the
installments for the debt stay the same. So, the liabilities need to be priced
separately.
200*[1-(1.07)^-10/(0.07)]=1404.716308
Although
most authors recommend to price the liabilities on their own. It is also true
the fact that when a net cash flow is accounted, the word by itself states is
NET. Liabilities may not have the same life span than that of the incoming cash
flows or by the time the business to be taken over has engaged itself with a
new loan.
Now the residual value = 1000
*(1.1)^20 = 6727.5k (#)
The
business new price is given by: 6056.042028 + 6727.5 - 1404.716308 = 11378.8256k
You
might have noticed the usage of a risk free rate not equal to that used to
discount the operational cash flow. There is absolute certainty about the
reimbursements to the lender while there is uncertainty about the incomes and
the amounts of those incomes to the business. According to several authors,
liabilities have to be discounted at the market's risk free rate and not
"the market rate" nor the nominal rate of the liabilities.
(#)The
residual value of certain assets is bigger now than in the future. Why? It is
because of 2 reasons: DEPRECIATION AND OUTDATING opposed to soils and premises
which are sensitive to market gains as time goes by.....
Sources:
Bloomberg,
Chicago Mercantile Exchange Group, RiskCenter, Investopedia, Wikipedia,
MIT-OCW, Coursera.org, Edx.org
No comments:
Post a Comment